Not every hole on the front side of a stew stove is a fire box. Usually I don't post much on my "flue-zies" research but a recent speaker to a culinary historian's group gave some of the same ole wrong information about the reproduction stew stove at Monticello. The correspondence between Jefferson and Foxall still exists about the iron work, which is great, so in this post I want to include their letters, below, and discuss how the grates and cheeks were really used/heated.
Grates and cheeks
Henry Foxall (1758-1823) from Georgetown did the iron work for the White House stewstove, according to the chef. Jefferson requested 8 grates - 2 large, 3 medium and 3 small - combined with the "box-part." However, Foxall made them separate and included 2 grates per hole, since he said "it might be difficult for you to obtain others when the first set of Grates might become useless." An original grate was found at Jefferson's Poplar Forest; from article about their new old kitchen HERE
Letters with Foxall about "stoves or stew-holes"
To Henry Foxall
Monticello Mar. 24. 09.
The cook which I had in Washington (mr Julien) [Honore Julien 1760-1830] and who is now with me for a time, informs me you made for the President’s [White House] kitchen some irons of casting for the stoves or stew-holes in the kitchen, in which the box-part & the grille1 or bars were all solid together, and that you made them of three sizes. I must ask the favor of you to make 8. for me, to wit, 2. of the largest size & 3 of the middle & 3 of the smallest size, and forward them for me to Richmond to the care of Messrs Gibson & Jefferson, forwarding me the bill at the same time. I must pray you to do it without delay, if convenient, as they are indispensable in a kitchen. Accept the assurances of my esteem & respect
From Henry Foxall
Georg Town Apl 11th 1809
Your favor of the 24th Ulto came to hand in due course, The Stew holes you request me to Send You, I have Made and put them on board a vessele bound for Richmond which is to sail this day
I observe the Information you have received respecting our Method of Makeing the Stew holes is not agreeable to our practice, we cast the Cheeks, and grates, sepperate and not Solid or together, the reason is that one set of Cheeks will Last as long as Many sets of grates—
I have Sent you a duble set of grates two to Each Stew hole, believeing it might be difficult for you to obtain others when the first set of Grates might become useless—
I have not given up the Intention of Executing the Stove you were so kind as to send me the Model of—when done I will inform you of its success, Should it answer the Expectation I have of it I will Send you one on agreeable to your request
I am Respectfully Sir Your Obedt Servt
To Henry Foxall
Monticello Apr. 4. 11
I have long waited & waited in the expectation that I might have occasion to make some larger remittance to Washington in which the 13.40 D due you might be included, as being a fractional sum. but finding none such arrive, I have concluded to remit it in our bank bills. I accordingly inclose 25 D. of which 12. are due to Conrad & co. booksellers on the Capitol hill, which I must pray you to pay to them. the denominations of our bills did not permit me to make either remittance separately. as the 40. Cents can only be sent in silver, I shall not put it into this letter that it may not excite suspicions, but will put it under separate cover by another post. Accept the assurance of my continued esteem & respect.
An article I wrote about stew stoves at Hampton (completed in 1790) in Maryland - “A Federal-era Kitchen: Hampton’s Stew Stove, Iron Oven, and Hearth” in Food and Material Culture : proceedings of the Oxford Symposium on Food and Cookery 2013 p248-255
Past blog posts on Stew Stoves - HERE
Picture of SS from Monticello website HERE
Picture of grate from Poplar Forest website HERE
Letters from the National Archives Founders Online HERE
©2016 Patricia Bixler Reber
Researching Food History HOME